![]() |
|
||
|
The Hidden Dangers of Being Perceived as a Faceless Firmby Tom "Bald Dog" Varjan, Organisational Provocateur Ask most service professionals what the number one building
block upon
which to build their futures, and they will tell you: Mutual trust and
respect. Then look at their promotional materials (brochures, websites
etc.),
and you see a faceless monstrosity of a corporate entity without a
shred of human touch. Even solo practitioners pontificate by using the royal plural
of “we”,
and “us”, trying to exaggerate the size of their firms, mistakenly
thinking that if they are perceived as a multi-person, multi-office
entity, then they have a better chance to sell their services. But they could also say: I am an army of one, and these are
your unique
benefits when you engage a lone wolf like me. So, instead of relying on
size as a business-getter, we could rely on our “soloness” as a
business-getter. The fact is that buyers are individuals and they can only
build
relationships with other individuals, and this is one more reason why
size doesn’t really matter. Many professionals believe that attachments to institutions
are
beneficial. People say, “I've done my MBA in Marketing at Stanford”. Great
institution. But they actually learnt the stuff to pass their MBA exams
from individuals not from the Stanford institution. And who were those
individuals? Have they ever done real-life marketing or only textbook
buffoonery? Have they ever written a promotional letter that had to
produce results or the client would have had some serious problems?
Have they ever been expected to "create" money or they starve to death?
Have they ever run a
business outside their nightmares? It is easy to pontificate behind the
protective shield of a secure job and a union pension (in Canada). When it comes to building trust, buyers are more concerned
with the
individual service professional than the whole institution. That may
come later or may not even come at all. Yet, when you examine professional firms' materials, they are
pontificating about the institution. They recognise that their people
are their most important assets, yet they leave these assets far in the
background, and hammer their prospects with the “institutional hammer”
like the nice scenery from the offices and the mahogany desk in the
boardroom. Just imagine. You are reading the brochure of the Courageous
Comrades
Coffin Carving Corp., and instead of reading about the firm’s people,
so you can start building a connection, you read rubrics like how broke
the president was when he started the business,
how big is the company’s parking lot and how meticulously the hardwood
floor was selected from the reception room. And of course the writer of the brochure also mentions that
trust is
the operating foundation of the firm. So now after all this rubbish, you are expected to contact the
firm at
info@website.com. So you are expected to build trust with a faceless entity and
send in
some of your personal information to somebody called “info”. So, now
trust goes down the drain because you have no idea who will read your
“confidential” information. Wow, holy sausage. We all laugh at this example, but this is exactly what you
find on most
professional firms’ websites. The way I look at it is that if I want to engage professionals
to help
with certain issues, I want to trust the people and want to engage
them, not the firm. That is I expect to have a one-to-one relationship
with a person, and I don’t want to become an invoice number in the
firm’s books. I want to collaborate with Webster not with Webster
Sponpule and Associates Inc. Can you sense the difference? So, the question that comes up for me is where are the people
behind
these faceless entities, and why they are ashamed of promoting their
own names and hide behind the corporate identity? I think one of the reasons is that they feel they are more
professional
when using only the firm’s name. Well, they may be more business-like
(although I doubt it) but definitely not more professional.
Business-like is mainly an external thing (How you dress for instance),
but being professional is a state of being. It is internal. It is the
way of conducting yourself. It is about your integrity,
trustworthiness, etc. The reason why it is a mistake to interchange the
two is because when you get up in the morning stretching and yawning
stark naked, you are just as professional as if you were fully dressed.
You don’t look business-like, but you are professional nevertheless. In theory we all know that marketing professional services
(experiences) is drastically different from marketing "things"
(commodities), yet, when you look at many firms' promotional materials,
you can see right away why they also complain about being perceived as
a commodity. Who the cricket has created that perception? And how can
you establish a different perception? By earning your prospects’ trust
and allowing them to sample your services. And here I am not talking about free consultation, which in
most cases
are extended sales pitches. I am talking about real sample sessions. A
session to which prospects come with signed cheques (of a nominal
amount to indicate commitment), and at the end of the sample sessions
you and the prospect make a joint decision as to whether or not there
is a mutually beneficial basis for working together. If there is, you
take the cheque and lump it to the final payment. If you decide not to
work together, the prospect takes the cheque and it is all over. So,
prospects can actually sample what it feels like working with you. That
beats any reference and testimonial. References and testimonials are
based on other people’s perception. How can you create your own
perception based on other people’s perception? That is retarded. So, what to do here. You can create a page for each person in your firm. I always
suggest to
clients that they make the top of their people's bios more corporate
and then
add an “On a Personal Note” section where they can put in a bit of
personal stuff. People love associating with the personal sides
of their
advisors. It is just the part of life. Nobody believes that you are
dressed in your business attire 24/7. So, show that you have a personal
side. Based on some articles I have read recently, it elevates trust to
a higher level. World-renowned professional service firm expert, David
Maister, frequently describes himself as a “fat smoker”, and
extensively uses examples from his personal life. So do Tom Peters and
many other business gurus. So, then what is the logic for the small guy’s putting up this
stiff-arsed corporate image day in day out? Also make sure you put all of your people on the website. Some
firms have the partners
and the management team on their sites, but how about others who work
there? Don’t they count? Don't they matter? Recognise that you your firm is a team and include everyone,
including
the receptionist. I have seen websites with a dedicated page for the
Vice President of Cleanliness. That was the janitor. In any business – a million times over in professional service
businesses – your people are your number one assets. Anyone can have
the
same furniture, same office building, same methodology you have. You
greatest differentiating factor is your people. It only makes sense to
be proud of them and making them visible. If a buyer recognises your
secretary’s face in the supermarket, provided she is skilled in
discussing possibilities, she can easily land new business for the firm. So, in closing, here is my firm belief. If you want to work on
high
volume like a company selling commodities, you can stay invisible. Low
price is low price. That can create enough attraction. You don't really
care if you buy your bread from Tom, Dick or Harry. You buy it at the
Bodacious Bumblebee Bakery. But it is very hard to convince clients to plunk down premium fees in return for the privilege of being in the sales ledger of Faceless Fibula Fixers Inc. These people want one-to-one trust-based relationships with specific individuals, not only with "the firm". | ||
|
Copyright Tom "Bald Dog" Varjan. All rights reserved. You are free to use this article in whole or in part. One favour though: Can I ask you to you include complete attribution, including a live website link. Also, can you please let me know where you plan to publish the article. The attribution: This article was written by Organisational Provocateur, Tom "Bald Dog" Varjan of Dynamic Innovations Squad, a firm specialising in helping consulting firms to sell their expertise at the highest margins. Get Tom's free Practice Management Black Paper when you sign up for his monthly newsletter, Commando Consulting: Lessons And Practices From The Ultimate Professional Service Firm, The Military. Visit Tom's website at http://www.di-squad.com. Copyright 2007 Tom "Bald Dog" Varjan & Dynamic Innovations Squad, All rights reserved. Vancouver, BC, Canada As you grow your people, in return, so they grow your firm |